The WMF Archives

Constructive Criticism VS. Deconstructive Criticism

Often as writers, we are not only writers but editors as well. We edit our own work, of course--but we also often edit for an employer, co-worker or friend. Whatever your reason for editing a piece, certain techniques and basic etiquette should be used, especially when editing another person's work. There is constructive criticism and deconstructive criticism. Knowing the difference between the two will help you become a more successful and influential editor.



Constructive Criticism

The basic definition of constructive criticism is to offer well reasoned and valid opinions of the work you are reading to improve the quality of the content. This can be done with both positive and negative comments about the writing piece, but you have to be careful when using negative comments.

Using constructive criticism is far more effective than deconstructive criticism when editing. Blatant rudeness doesn't serve either party. If you do not practice proper constructive criticism techniques and etiquette, your job as an editor can quickly devolve into deconstructive criticism.
To ensure you are doing the best job you can do as an editor, there are certain guidelines you should follow to help improve the quality of the writing piece.


Respect

Try to always remain respectful of the writer. You can still offer your advice and opinions in a respectful manner even if they are negative comments. You may be the greatest editor on the planet, but it is important to keep your ego in check. Flaunting your impressive editorial skills in the writer's face does not do the writer or the piece any good. The author is more likely to respond and improve their writing with respectful comments made about their work than rude and inconsiderate comments. Writers understand that they should expect a little criticism, but they shouldn't have to expect to be treated disrespectfully in any way.


Positivity

Of course, the editing job includes pointing out the mistakes made in a writing piece, but it should also include pointing out some of the writer's stronger points. Positive reinforcement can really help a writer to fast-track their path to improvement.

While editing, it's not necessary to include numerous positive comments through out the piece, but one or two wouldn't hurt. For example, the author may have organized their writing piece very well despite possible spelling or grammar mistakes. Be sure to point this out so the writer knows their strong area and exactly where they need to improve.


Negativity

Making negative comments about a writing piece should be handled carefully. When editing, you need to say what you mean and be to the point--but it's not necessary to be offensive.

For example, maybe the writer forgets to insert commas in the correct places. Do not mark every single comma mistake, simply mark one and leave a comment of how and why a comma is used. This will help the writer find their own mistakes and improve their writing ability. Too much negativity about a piece is more likely to offend a writer than help them. People are not as open to improvement when offend as they are when offered helpful advice.


Although all writers must learn to deal with both constructive and deconstructive criticism, there are some editors who just go too far and a writer knows when this occurs.

Maintaining a good relationship with your editing clients will not only help them improve, but can also enhance your experience as an editor. Writers are more likely to respond to helpful and professional editors that practice proper critiquing etiquette in a positive and productive manner every time.

Of course, we can offer all the advice we like--but that won't change some people. Watch for our upcoming article, A Writer's Guide to Dealing With Rude Editors.

Do You Know the Difference?